New Jersey Conservation Foundation
 
New Jersey Conservation Foundation Menu
NJCF Homepage Contact Us Donate Events Search NJCF
New Jersey Land Conservation Organization
Donate to New Jersey Conservation Foundation
State We're In New Jersey Conservation Foundation Blog
Ballot question approval would lock in environmental funds
10/13/2017

If your community’s land and water were contaminated - and the polluter was fined for the damage – where do you think the money should go?

Should the funds be dedicated to protecting or restoring natural resources in the impacted area, or should they go into the general state budget, or fill some other program need?  This question will be decided by New Jersey voters on Nov. 7.

In theory, here’s how New Jersey’s Natural Resource Damages fund works:  Companies found liable for damaging the environment pay into a fund whose purpose is to restore damaged lands and waterways, and compensate the community for being deprived of the use of those resources.

In practice, however, not all of the damages money gets spent on cleanups, restorations and environmental projects. For years, state elected officials have used Natural Resource Damages funds to plug holes in the state’s budget, sometimes leaving only a small amount of the money for restoration.

That’s exactly what happened with pollution in the Passaic River. Due to decades of industrial uses in the river's watershed, the Passaic is contaminated with a toxic mix of chemicals, including dioxins, PCBs, pesticides and heavy metals. The pollutants harm the river's ecosystem, and fish and crabs from the river’s waters are unfit for human consumption.

Between 2013 and 2014, New Jersey received $355 million from settlements with companies responsible for polluting the Passaic. Of the $355 million, the lion’s share - $288 million - ended up in the state’s general operating budget. Less than 20 percent was allocated for restoration work.

This diversion of funds was considered legal. The largest settlement, with Occidental Chemical, required that only $50 million be allocated to restoring the river, with the remaining funds "to be used as the Governor and Legislature deem appropriate."

A question on the Nov. 7 ballot proposes a “lockbox” that would require Natural Resource Damages funds to be used only for their intended purpose of restoration and environmental cleanup. Hundreds of millions of dollars per year are at stake.

If Public Question 2 passes, the state’s Constitution will be amended to specify that every dollar in polluter fines “would have to be used to repair, restore, replace, or preserve the State’s natural resources.” The money could also be used for the legal costs of recovering fines from polluters.

Passage of the ballot question could impact the state’s pending pollution settlement with ExxonMobil, which has not been finalized due to litigation.

In 2015, ExxonMobil was found liable for damaging 1,500 acres of wetlands and tidal marshes near its Linden and Bayonne refineries and 16 other sites. The state settled the ExxonMobil case for $225 million, most of which could to go toward balancing the state budget and paying legal fees. The settlement is being challenged in court by environmental groups and Senator Raymond Lesniak, who claim the sum is not sufficient.

Public Question 2, also known as the “Revenue from Environmental Damage Lawsuits Dedicated to Environmental Projects Amendment” question, was put on the ballot in late 2016 by a bipartisan vote of the state Legislature.

Assemblyman John McKeon, one of the sponsors, explained:  “These funds were the result of environmental contamination settlements and should only be used to repair the damage caused by the contamination and for measures that can help protect our environment.”

Opponents to placing the question on the ballot maintained that the state requires flexibility to allocate funds as needed.

According to the ballot question’s interpretive statement, “This amendment would dedicate moneys collected by the State relating to natural resource damages through settlements or awards for legal claims based on environmental contamination. These moneys would be dedicated to repair, replace, or restore damaged natural resources, or to preserve the State’s natural resources. The moneys would be spent in an area as close as possible to the geographical area in which the damage occurred. The moneys could also be used to pay for the State’s legal or other costs in pursuing the claims. Currently, these moneys may be used for any State purpose.”

For more information on Public Question 2 and its history and impacts, go to https://ballotpedia.org/New_Jersey_Public_Question_2,_Revenue_from_Environmental_Damage_Lawsuits_Dedicated_to_Environmental_Projects_Amendment_(2017).

Get out and vote on Nov. 7! And to learn more about protecting New Jersey’s land and natural resources, go to the New Jersey Conservation Foundation website at www.njconservation.org or contact me at  info@njconservation.org.

 

POSTS

Catch the Perseids meteor shower!

Check out the 'fun' in fungi

Too hot to think? Studies shows heat affects your brain

Love NJ's outdoors? Take action now!

New Jersey's official reptile, the bog turtle

Sea level rise and New Jersey: Not perfect together

These New Jersey plants have an appetite for insects

Explore the Pine Barrens through paddles, hikes and tours

Like to jog? 'Plog' instead and keep NJ clean

Love Jersey fruit? Thank our native pollinators!

Good news for globally rare swamp pink lilies

Say cheese! Remote cameras aid wildlife research

Begone, single-use plastic bags!

3,000 birds and counting for 'bluebird grandfather'

The Pine Barrens gets some help from its friends

A clean energy future for New Jersey

Cowtown and rare grassland birds, perfect together

Fight light pollution during International Dark Sky Week

New film tells story of how Petty's Island was saved

Ten years of nipping invasive species in the bud

Welcome spring in a county park

Go for a walk and feel better!

Grab a friend and go outside

Recycle your way to zero waste!

Last call for winter wildlife watching on Jersey coast

Without its 'understory' layer, the forest will collapse

From whale songs to poetry, a remarkable journey

A cleaner, greener New Jersey

Let's keep New Jersey the Garden State, not the Pipeline State

New Jersey's winter hikes

'Trees don't vote' but Byrne saved Pine Barrens anyway

Governor-elect Murphy should set new course on the environment

Protect soils to keep the garden in our state

Clean, plentiful water is New Jersey's lifeblood

A breath of fresh air for New Jersey?

Keep Liberty State Park free and open

A green agenda for Governor-elect Murphy

Life, liberty ... and a clean environment

New Jersey's aging water infrastructure

The land before time: NJ's Kittatinny Ridge & Valley

While bats hibernate, scientists hope for survival

Natural Resource Damages fund new parks and preserves

Save menhaden, a humble but mighty fish

Ballot question approval would lock in environmental funds

Sandy Millspaugh: Conservation Trailblazer

Extreme hurricanes highlight concerns about climate change

'Head start' for corn snakes

Protecting the Highlands - it's the water

When you could walk from New Jersey to Morocco

A bold plan for the planet

ARCHIVE

August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011

CLICK FOR RECENT POSTS


New Jersey Conservation Foundation on FacebookNew Jersey Conservation Foundation on TwitterNew Jersey Conservation Foundation on FlickrNew Jersey Conservation Foundation YouTube ChannelShare      
New Jersey Conservation Foundation           Bamboo Brook, 170 Longview Road, Far Hills, NJ 07931           908-234-1225           info@njconservation.org
home  | nj statewide eventscontact us  |  sitemap  |  privacy policy  |  DONATE